A Guide to Trance Land by Bill O'Hanlon

Title: A Guide to Trance Land: A Practical Handbook of Ericksonian and Solution-Oriented Hypnosis

Author: Bill O’Hanlon

Format: Book

Rating: Good

It's been a while since I posted a review--I've been busy editing several books and co-authoring one, so I haven't had a lot of time for leisure reading and reviewing. I am happy to dig back in with A Guide to Trance Land.

Bill O’Hanlon is a name you may know if you listen to any of the webinars that Ruth Buczynski hosts—at least that’s how I first heard his name. As the author himself explains, O’Hanlon was Milton Erickson’s gardener and student; the back-cover describes him as “a psychotherapist, professional speaker, and prolific author,” before mentioning that he has appeared on the Oprah Winfrey show.

Setting aside his reputation, I was eager to see if this small tome would hold up, and I have to say I was pleased with what I found.

For anyone familiar with conversational hypnosis or the Milton Model from NLP, the first section of the book is a concise review. Even so, as I read it, I thought to myself, “If I wanted a new hypnotist to grasp the basics of conversational hypnosis, this might be the book I would recommend.” The language is plain and clear, and each idea is presented in a short, easy to digest portion—something which O’Hanlon explains in his introduction he is doing on purpose.

Around page 68, though, the book went from being a good review or clear introduction into discussing something that is paradigm-shifting. You see, Erickson was known for having no unifying psychological theory, no single therapeutic approach; instead, it’s widely thought that he simply invented a new therapy for every client. In fact, Erickson is noted for having said that he wanted to fit his approach to each client, rather than fitting each client to the approach.

So, flying in the face of the conventional wisdom on Ericksonian hypnosis, O’Hanlon states that he has discerned a pattern in Erickson’s cases—a system, if you will.

Now, I’m not going to give away what that system is—if you want to know it, buy the book—and I can’t say whether O’Hanlon is right about the system he presents really being the essence of Erickson’s work. What I will say is that wherever it came from, the system O’Hanlon presents is brilliant, and perhaps it shouldn’t be buried in the middle of what seemed at first like a run-of-the-mill review of the Milton Model. It also needs a better name than the one O’Hanlon gives it: the “Class of Problems and Class of Solutions Model.” It’s got no zip; I just can’t dance to it.

In truth, O’Hanlon doesn’t prove his assertion; in fact, he doesn’t seem to be interested in making the case that the pattern he’s discerned is really there in Erickson’s case studies. Fair enough. I’ll still go out on a limb and say that his brief discussion starting on page 68 is something every hypnotist should take a look at. There’s a joke that Erickson once said of Bandler and Grinder (the inventors of NLP), “They think they have me in a nutshell, but all they have is the shell.” I think it’s possible that O’Hanlon got the nut.

As if that weren’t enough, O’Hanlon follows that brief passage with a really great discussion of the question “Should We Trust the Unconscious?” He really synthesizes alternate views on that topic in a plain-spoken, yet insightful, way.

Can I criticize A Guide to Trance Land? There are a few things that bother me, yes, but to tell the truth, they are really not important enough to even list.

My main criticism of this book is that I want more. I want more concrete examples of certain ideas, especially the “Good Trance/Bad Trance.” I want more discussion and examples of how to use the model he presents.

Overall, I have to say, it’s a good read with a number of valuable ideas for the hypnotist.